...
Panel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Projections are key to formulate the expectations regarding future cash flows to have the liquidity at the desired level. Unfortunatly there is no way to predict the future reliably. However the Apliqo LP PM solution offers the ability to model best-practices for projection based on the solid data foundation. The solution supports the standard “Takahashi - Alexander Model”. |
How it works
The Apliqo LP PM projection model estimates
• the cumulative future distributions,
•The Quarterly NAV net gains and the
•Quarterly cash-flows: distributions and capital calls.
the model leverages the Takahashi-Alexander Model (a.k.a. Yale Model) and uses fund data with a minimum of 10 years. The model takes the fund strategy (e.g. Buyout) into consideration
For each investment a assumed projection curve is applied
Distributions
Drawdowns, Capital Calls, Contributions
Net Gain curve Scenario
these generic curves can be over-written with estimates, if required.
The model
The projection model takes into consideration the available reported data (dark green) and the estimations by the LP (light green). The model applies Apliqo proprietary projections methods (yellow arrows) to calculate the expected NAV uplift and the quarterly distributions per fund.
...
Legend
...
projects the quarterly values for
NAV
Distributions
Contributions
The key projections are based on statistical models for
Projected total NAV net gain
Projected quarterly NAV net gain
Projected quarterly cash-flows projections for distributions commitments
The projection model is aware of the fund strategies
Buyout
Growth
Venture Capital
The statistical model is based on fund data with at least 10 years of track-record
Apliqo LP PM supports custom statistical models. User generated models can be loaded into the system.
Info |
---|
more details to the Apliqo LP PM cash flow projection model can be requested at |
...
Where to maintain the projections?
The projections are maintained in the Data Management - Fund setup - Fund projection assumptions
...
How are the projections calculated?
The model estimates for all Asset Classes and Strategies different contribution and distributions per quarter, based on the historic performance of the these asset groups.
Available Strategies are: Venture (VC), Buyout (BO), Growth (GROWTH), Infrastructure (INFRA), Real Estate (RE), Private Debt (PD)
The Portfolio manager applies for each fund a percentile estimate on how the fund will call capital and pay distributions.
Apliqo maintains a forecast model for these asset classes and strategies per vintage year. As an example a contribution curve for a Buyout fund rated as 75 % percentile could look like this.
...
Note |
---|
Disclaimer:
|
The quarterly projected NAV net gain is calculated on the
...
Net gain curve
The model supports 3 different net gain curves. The curves differ from the speed, how quickly the fund reaches its total projected NAV uplift.
...
Where can it be found in the solution
...
Where to maintain the projections?
The projections are maintained in the Data Management - Fund setup - Fund projection assumptions
...
Where can it be found in the solution
...
What is the basis of the projection assumptions?
The statistical projection assumptions for the Apliqo LP PM Projection Model are based on cashflows and valuations from over 1’200 funds, with a minimum of 10 years of history.
Buyout funds: 816
Growth funds: 121
VC funds: 324
With the vintages between 1985 and 2014 the value development the model covers different economical cycles.
Dotcom-Bubble (1995-2000)
Y2K recession (2000-2002)
Global Financial Crisis (2007-2009)
COVID 19 (2020-2021)
To exclude the younger funds does minimize the risk to base the projection on inflated unrealized inflated valuations during a period of very low interest rates.
Table: breakdown of Funds per vintage and strategy
BO | Growth | VC | |
Total | 816 | 121 | 324 |
1985 | 2 | ||
1986 | 1 | 2 | |
1987 | 4 | 2 | |
1988 | 5 | 1 | |
1989 | 1 | ||
1990 | 1 | 4 | |
1991 | 3 | 1 | |
1992 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
1993 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
1994 | 16 | 6 | |
1995 | 13 | 7 | |
1996 | 17 | 2 | 8 |
1997 | 20 | 12 | |
1998 | 36 | 1 | 16 |
1999 | 31 | 3 | 19 |
2000 | 33 | 5 | 37 |
2001 | 21 | 3 | 23 |
2002 | 22 | 2 | 15 |
2003 | 28 | 11 | |
2004 | 30 | 3 | 10 |
2005 | 58 | 6 | 14 |
2006 | 66 | 10 | 20 |
2007 | 67 | 13 | 26 |
2008 | 62 | 9 | 19 |
2009 | 27 | 6 | 7 |
2010 | 36 | 7 | 10 |
2011 | 43 | 14 | 13 |
2012 | 45 | 11 | 10 |
2013 | 60 | 9 | 11 |
2014 | 57 | 14 | 9 |
Why are projections beyond 6 years tend to have strong dips?
The Apliqo projection model assumes a lifecycle of up to 60 quarters, 15 years. For funds older then 60 quarters only the acutal cumulative distributions are taken into consideration. Younger funds include the projected cumulative distributions up to the 60th quarter. If a fund reaches the age of 60 quarters. the cumulative distributions will no longer be taken into consideration.
...